2025:HHC:13617 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Exe. Pt. No. 293 of 2024 Decided on : 13.05.2025 Sh. Raj Mal. …Petitioner Versus HPSEB Ltd. and another. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Nisha, Advocate, vice Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has handed over a copy of instructions received from under Secretary (NGE), HPSEBL, Shimla, addressed to Senior Executive Engineer, Elect. Division, HPSEBL, Nurpur, H.P. In terms of the instructions though the respondents have preferred an appeal against the judgment in issue but they have decided to implement the judgment subject to the final outcome of the Letters Patent appeal. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:13617 2. In the light of this development, these proceedings are closed, with the observation that let the judgment be implemented in letter and spirit within a period of four weeks from today, subject to the outcome of the Letters Patent Appeal, failing which, the petitioner shall be at liberty to revive the present proceedings by filing an appropriate application. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 13, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)