1 of 2 18-WP.9491.2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 18 WRIT PETITION NO. 9491 OF 2014 OMPRAKASH LAXMANRAO DALVI VERSUS TARAMATI LAXMAN DALVI ... Ms. Ranjita Mahajan h/f. Mr. Sudhir K. Chavan, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Swanand Lathkar h/f. Subodh P. Shah, Advocate for Respondent No.3. … CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. DATE : 16th JUNE, 2025 P.C.:- 1. Ms. Ranjita Mahajan h/f. Mr. Sudhir K. Chavan, learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the parties have amicably settled the controversy. 2. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the compromise in between the parties was recorded in Second Appeal No.236 of 2011, which was disposed of in terms of compromise by order dated 13th March 2025. It is submitted that in view of this compromise the instant writ petition also needs to be disposed of, as the grievance of the Petitioners does not survive. Mr. Swanand Lathkar holding for Mr. S. P. Shah does not dispute the position. 2025:BHC-AUG:15124 2 of 2 18-WP.9491.2014 3. In view of this, writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) Tauseef