Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25837 (AP)

MIRIYALA LAKSHMANA RAO v. STATE OF AP

WP/24340/2020 · 2025-08-17

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010365762020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24340/2020 Between: 1. MIRIYALA LAKSHMANA RAO, AP ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME A. P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IBRAHIMPATNAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No 2 and 3 in not providing police aid in implementing the injunction orders In IA No 112 dated 17.03.2020 passed in OS No 426 of 2020 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge Courts, Vijayawada through the petitioners made a complaint dated 07.04.2020 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also violations of Article 14,16,19,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent NO 2 and 3 to provide police aid in implementing the orders of Civil Court in IA No 112 dated 17.03.2020 passed in OS No 426 of 2020 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24340 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No 2 and 3 in not providing police aid in implementing the injunction orders In I.A.No.112 dated 17.03.2020 passed in O.S.No.426 of 2020 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge Courts, Vijayawada through the petitioners made a complaint dated 07.04.2020 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also violations of Article 14,16,19,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent NO 2 and 3 to provide police aid in implementing the orders of Civil Court in I.A.No.112 dated 17.03.2020 passed in O.S.No.426 of 2020 and pass…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the same, the Writ petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 18.08.2025. SRT HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.24340 of 2020 Dated.18.08.2025 SRT 124