Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:31301 Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2813 of 2025 Petitioner :- Razia Rashid Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nanhe Lal Tripathi,Rahul Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1. Heard Ms. Priya Chandra, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State.
2. Learned counsel is able to point out that petitioner's case may be considered in the light of judgments of Supreme Court in Canara Bank vs. Ajithkumar G.K., 2025 INSC 184 and Tinku vs. State of Haryana and others, 2024 INSC 867 for compassionate appointment and if there is any legal impediment, the same may be communicated to petitioner in a short period.
3. In aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is
disposed of with an observation that if petitioner files an application for compassionate appointment in a proper format along with factual and legal issues, the application will be considered in accordance with law after taking note of judgments of Supreme Court in Canara Bank and Tinku (supras). In case respondent concerned finds any legal impediment, the same shall be communicated to petitioner within a short period.
4. Learned counsel has extended her apology that documents annexed in this writ petition are illegible and she submits that she will remain cautious in future.
Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Sinha_N. Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad