Radhe Kumar Yadav @ Radheshyam Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./18415/2025 · 2025-10-08
Sandeep Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25835 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25835 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18415 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2024 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Radhe Kumar Yadav @ Radheshyam Yadav Son of Abhi Nandan Yadav @ Ravi Nandan Yadav R/O- Jogiya Ward No.1, P.S.- Ladaniya, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 08-10-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 171 of 2024 registered for the offence under Section 394, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals are said to have fired upon the victim and looted him.
4. The petitioner is in custody since 20.08.2024.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued this case and has submitted that the allegation of firing is against one Amar Yadav and not the petitioner.
6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the application of the petitioner and has submitted that during
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18415 of 2025(4) dt.08-10-2025 2/2 investigation, the petitioner has been named in the self inculpatory statement of other co-accused and he is accused in three more cases of similar and serious nature.
7. Though, the learned counsel for the petitioner has argued this case vehemently but in such a serious case, the petitioner cannot be granted bail.
8. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
9. If the trial of the petitioner is delayed by the prosecution then the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.
Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U