2025:HHC:12224 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Exe. Pet. No. 1210 of 2024 Decided on: 02.05.2025 Sh. Lekh Raj … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the surviving grievance of the petitioner is that the arrears as stand calculated having not been paid to him and only a part payment thereof has been made. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that some reasonable time be granted to the respondents to make good the deficient amount. 3. Let the entire due and admissible amount be paid in favour of the petitioner on or before 30.09.2025 and these proceedings are closed but with rider that, in case, the needful is not 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:12224 done by the respondents by the date fixed, then, the petitioner shall have the liberty to revive these proceedings by way of appropriate application. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 02, 2025 (narender)