Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:31145 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6436 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amar Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief :
"i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to complete the construction of chak marg No. 98/0.0590 hectare situated in village Baniyapar Chak Muztawa, Post-Kalyanpur, Tehsil- Ghosi, District- Mau. ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to take necessary action on the application dated 07.09.2024 Under Section 26 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Annexure No.3 to this writ petition)."
3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach appropriate authority by moving an application under Section 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 in view of the judgments passed by this Court in case of Jahar Singh v. State of U.P. reported in 2017(4) ADJ 619 as well as in Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2023 (12) ADJ 226.
4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition.
5. In case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 26 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, before appropriate authority, the same shall be decided after hearing all the concerned parties in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. Order Date :- 5.3.2025 S. Singh (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad