Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010011822025 2025:GAU-AS:14527 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RFA/8/2025 B M PHARMA AND HEALTHCARE PVT LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 3A, KALINDI PLAZA, DR. J.C. DAS ROAD, PANBAZAR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN 781001, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI SANJEEV DEV CHOUDHURY. 2: SRI SANJEEV DEV CHOUDHURY DIRECTOR OF B. M. PHARMA AND HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 34 KALINDI PLAZA DR J.C DAS ROAD PANBAZAR GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN - 781001 VERSUS AYURSUNDRA HOSPITAL PVT LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BHABANANDA BORO PATH, OPPOSITE DPS SCHOOL, AHOM GAON, GARCHUK, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN 781035, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, 2:ABHIJIT HAZARIKA THE DIRECTOR OF THE AYURSUNDRA HOSPITALPVT LTD BHABANANDA BORO PATH OPPOSITE DPS SCHOOL AHOM GAON Page No.# 2/3 GARCHUK GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN 781035. 3:SRI SIMANTA UMESH DAS THE DIRECTOR OF THE AYURSUNDRA HOSPITAL PVT LTD BHABANANDA BORO PATH OPPOSITE DPS SCHOOL AHOM GAON GARCHUK GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN 781035. 4:SRI MANOJ KUMAR DEKA THE DIRECTOR OF THE AYURSUNDRA HOSPITALPVT LTD BHABANANDA BORO PATH OPPOSITE DPS SCHOOL AHOM GAON GARCHUK GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN 781035. 5:SRI GAUTOM SARMA THE DIRECTOR OF THE AYURSUNDRA HOSPITAL PVT LTD BHABANANDA BORO PATH OPPOSITE DPS SCHOOL AHOM GAON GARCHUK GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN 781035. 6:KAUSTAB PURKAYASTHA GROUP HEAD PROCUREMENT AYURSUNDRA HOSPITALS PVT. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BHABANANDA BORO PATH OPPOSITE DPS SCHOOL AHOM GAON GARCHUK GUWAHATI ASSAM Page No.# 3/3 PIN 781035 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS L RONGPIPI, MR JITENDRA DAS,MR. SAILENDRA DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 29.10.2025 1. Heard Mr. S. Deka, the learned counsel for the appellant, who submits that as the matter involved in this case has been amicably settled between the parties, this appeal has become infructuous and accordingly, prays for allowing the appellant to withdraw the same. 2. The prayer is allowed. 3. This appeal is dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant