Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25825 (JHR)

GYANESHWAR PRASAD SRIVASTAVA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

C.M.P./836/2024 · 2025-09-19

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:29135 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 836 of 2024 ------ Gyaneshwar Prasad Srivastava, aged about 60 years, Son of Late Jageshwar Prasad Srivastava, Resident of village:- Paratha Colony, Tungri Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S.-Chaibasa, District-West Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary Department of Industry, Project Building, P.O. & P.S-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Department of Industry, Hand Sericulture Handicraft, Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. ….. Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Awadhesh Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party(s): Mr. Jayant Franklin Toppo ----- 02/ 19.09.2025 1. This application has been filed for restoration of W.P.(S). No. 1070 of 2013 to its original file, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that he could not file the necessary documents within peremptory period, thus W.P.(S). No. 1070 of 2013 was dismissed for non-compliance of the order. He submits that no sooner this writ petition is restored, he will file all necessary documents. 3. Considering the aforesaid submission, this C.M.P. is allowed. Consequently, the W.P.(S). No. 1070 of 2013 is restored to its original file subject to condition that petitioner will comply the peremptory order by 17.10.2025. If the order is not complied with, this order will not be given effect to. 4. After restoration, W.P.(S). No. 1070 of 2013 be listed before an appropriate Bench. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Rashmi/-