[2025:RJ-JP:6439-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 47/2020 Smt. Archana Khandelwal W/o Shri Nirmal Kumar Khandelwal, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 62/99, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Ms. Suchi Sharma, Secretary To The Govt. Department Of College Education, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Shri Pradeep Kumar Borad, Commissioner, College Education, Rajasthan Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur 3. Shri Shankar Lal Todwal, Secretary Managing Committee, Shri Khandelwal Vaishya Post Graduate Mahila Mahavidhyalya, Sankar Chandra Road, Jaipur 4. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Additional Chief Secretary To The Govt., Department Of College Education, Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.P. Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Basant Singh Chhaba, AAG with Mr. Hardik Singh, Adv., Mr. Digvijay Singh, Adv. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 13/02/2025 1. Heard. 2. This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 24.08.2018 and subsequent directions issued from time to time in the matter of grant of various benefits to the petitioner arising from judgment passed by this Court in the case of State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. The Management Committee [2025:RJ-JP:6439-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-47/2020] SH. Bhagwan Das Todi College (D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.663/2015, decided on 06.11.2015). 3. A detailed reply and additional reply both have been filed by the respondents. In the additional reply, it has been stated that the admitted amount of Rs.4,72,423/- after due deduction, as calculated by the State, has been made. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that while working out arrears of 6th Pay Commission, proper pay fixation has not been made as per order dated 17.01.2008 passed by the Rajasthan Non Government Educational Institutions Tribunal, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to “the Tribunal”) in petitioner’s case Smt. Archana Khandelwal Versus Managing Committee & Others (Application No.73/2004). 4. The order which was passed by this Court earlier, of which disobedience is alleged, had not decided the claim of the petitioner on the basis of the aforesaid order. Whether pay fixation is in accordance with the order passed by the Tribunal, is outside the scope of contempt petition. 5. Therefore, the contempt petition is closed. Rule stands discharged. However, petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the pay fixation. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT /chandan/32