Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25817 (GAU)

PURNIMA DEVI AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

WP(C)/3664/2025 · 2025-12-02

Rajesh Mazumdar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010141382025 2025:GAU-AS:16581 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3664/2025 PURNIMA DEVI AND ANR W/O LT PURENDRA CHANDRA NATH R/O VILL ALENGMARI PO LAKHIGANJ PS BILASIPARA DIST DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783345 2: BIBHUJIT NATH LT PURENDRA CHANDRA NATH R/O VILL ALENGMARI PO LAKHIGANJ PS BILASIPARA DIST DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 78334 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REP BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECREATRY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM REVENUE LR DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 2:TEH DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DHUBRI DIST DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783301 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BILASIPARA REVENUE CIRCLE PO BILASIPARA DIST DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 78334 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J I MONDAL, MR M A ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC. REVENUE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 03.12.2025 Page No.# 2/2 None appears for the petitioner on call. Mr. H. Sharma, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam has submitted that the affidavit-in-opposition has been filed by the respondent No. 3. The grievance as raised in this writ petition by the petitioner was regarding alleged failure of the respondent authorities to process the petitioner’s application for land sale permission and prayers were made to direct the respondents to grant the sale permission to the petitioner in respect of a plot of land measuring 01 Bigha 01 Katha 09 Lechas covered by Dag No. 2, Patta No. 86, situated at revenue Village- Bhashanigaon under Bilasipara Revenue Circle in the District- Dhubri, Assam. In the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent authorities, it has been stated that the application for grant of sale permission and further process is required to be done through the SEWA SETU, a Comprehensive Citizen Platform. It is stated that no application in the name of the petitioner is found in the said portal and that there is no averment made in the writ petition that such application was submitted through the said portal. None appears for the petitioner on call today. In view of the assertions made in the affidavit-in-opposition, this writ petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to apply for the land sale permission and other requisite through the SEWA SETU portal as required. On receipt of such application, the respondent authorities shall process the same expeditiously in accordance with law and within the time framed provided for. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE Comparing Assistant