Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25817 (AP)

P G N P SRINIVAS v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/18306/2025 · 2025-07-28

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010365222025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 18306/2025 Between: 1. P G N P SRINIVAS, S/O DR. P. NARASIMHA RAO, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC SENIOR MANAGER (ELECTRICAL), C/O K.M.V. PROJECTS LTD., 302, 3 RD FLOOR, NO.7, EAST PARK ROAD, KUMARA PARK, EAST BENGULURU - 560001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE VICE CHAIRMAN, TIRUPATI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (TUDA) YSR BHAVAN. TUDA OFFICE ROAD, TUDA OFFICE RD, TIRUPATI - 517501. 3. THE SECRETARY, TIRUPATI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (TUDA), YSR BHAVAN, TUDA OFFICE ROAD, TUDA OFFICE RD, TIRUPATI - 517501. 4. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, TIRUPATI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (TUDA), YSR BHAVAN, TUDA OFFICE ROAD, TUDA OFFICE RD, TIRUPATI-517501. 5. P SANTHAMMA, W/O LATE P.SIDDA REDDY, AGED 80 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO.3-1-61. 4TH CROSS, VIDYA NAGAR.TIRUPATI 2 6. P B REDDY P BONUS REDDY PALIPATI, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. AGED _ YEARS R/O. D.NO.3-1-61,4TH CROSS EAST, VIDYA NAGAR COLONY PERURU VILLAGE, TIRUPATI 7. BASAM MANJUNATHA REDDY, S/O. B.HARIKRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-1 -61,4TH CROSS EAST, VIDYA NAGAR COLONY PERURU VILLAGE, TIRUPATI ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A V KONDAIAH 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 3. Karri kalyan Durga Prasad SC FOR TUDA 3 The Court made the following Order: The petitioner is challenging the inaction on part of respondent authorities in considering his representation dated 16.04.2025. The petitioner sought action against the alleged unauthorized construction made by respondent Nos.5 to 7. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4 submits that the representation of the petitioner was considered and endorsement dated 30.06.2025 was also sent to the petitioner. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed, leaving it open for the petitioner to take steps if so aggrieved with the endorsement dated 30.06.2025. No costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 29.07.2025 Ivd 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.18306 of 2025 Date: 29.07.2025 Ivd