DEEPAK S/O RAGHUSINGH @ NAGU SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9540/2025 · 2025-07-29
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25812 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25812 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:28618] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9540/2025
1. Deepak S/o Raghusingh @ Nagu Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Narayanpur, Police Station Sadar, Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota).
2. Kanhaiya @ Kanuda S/o Ratiram, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Kumbhkot, Police Station Suket, District Kota (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lakhan Singh Jadoun Mr. Ayush Bamboriya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 29/07/2025
1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.137/2025 registered at Police Station-Suket, District-Kota Rural for the offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioners is of theft from the house of complainant-Vikram Singh. Petitioners are behind the bars since 21.05.2025 and no further custodial interrogation is
[2025:RJ-JP:28618] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9540/2025] required. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Deepak S/o Raghusingh @ Nagu Singh and Kanhaiya @ Kanuda S/o Ratiram shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/264