PANDAV SINGH CHOUDHARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND
LPA/553/2024 · 2025-06-25
Rajesh Kumar, Sujit Narayan Prasad
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25810 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25810 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2023:JHHC:26814-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A No.553 of 2024 ---- Pandav Singh Choudhary, aged about 52 years, son of Late Tarapada Singh Choudhary, resident of Village: Kandra, P.O.Kurra, P.S. Pindrajora, District- Bokaro
…. …. Appellant -Versus-
1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO Dhurwa, PS Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi
2. Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, PO & PS. Bokaro Steel City, District-Bokaro
3. Additional Collector, Bokaro, PO & PS. Bokaro Steel City, District-Bokaro
4. Circle Officer, Chas, PO & PS Chas, District-Bokaro
5. Executive Engineer, Building Department, Bokaro, PO & PS Bokaro Steel City, District-Bokaro.
…. …. Respondents ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Appellant
: Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate
For the Respondents
: Mr. Rahul Kamlesh, A.C. to S.C.-IV ----
Order No.05/Dated: 25th June, 2025
1. The instant appeal has been filed under clause 10 of the Letters Patent, which is directed against the order dated 06.08.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 1998 of 2024 whereby and where under the writ petition filed by the appellant has been disposed of directing the appellant to approach competent authority by filing a representation.
2. After some arguments, Mr. A. K. Sahani, learned counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal but the prayer has been made that since the learned Single Judge has not given any time frame to dispose of the representation, hence, time frame may be given if the appellant will approach before the competent authority by filing representation.
2023:JHHC:26814-DB
3. There is no opposition on behalf of Mr. Rahul Kamlesh, learned A.C to S.C-IV.
4. Considering the prayer made on behalf of the appellant, this appeal is hereby, dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the appellant to approach the competent authority as directed by the learned Single Judge.
5. If such representation is filed within two weeks from today then the Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro will decide the said representation within three months from the date of receipt of such representation.
6. It is needless to say that while considering the claim of the writ petitioner, the competent authority will hear all the affected parties.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim of the parties.
8. Consequently, the instant letters patent appeal stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Amar/Raja Uploaded
Page No.2 LPA No.553 of 2024