Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2581 (GAU)

NUR ALOM ALIAS NUR ALOM SK ALIAS MANGLU v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Bail Appln./3020/2025 · 2026-03-18

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010184642025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3020/2025 NUR ALOM ALIAS NUR ALOM SK ALIAS MANGLU SON OF WAHALA ALI @ WAHAB ALI RESIDENT OF VILL- ANTHANIBARI,P.S. GOSSAIGAON, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM, PIN-783360. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:JAMIR ALI S/O LATE OHED ALI RESIDENT OF VILL- HASRAWBARI P.O. SERFANGURI P.S. GOSSAIGAON DIST. KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN-783346 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A MONDAL, MR. A ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR S RAHMAN(R-2),MD S A MONDAL (R-2),MR. A A R KARIM(R-2),MR. T R DEURI, AMICUS CURIAE FOR R-2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Page No.# 2/3 19.03.2026 1. Heard Mr. M. A. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. A. A. R. Karim, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2. 2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner, namely, Nur Alom @ Nur Alom Sk @ Manglu, praying for grant of bail in connection with Gossaigaon P.S. Case No.76/2020, which after completion of investigation was registered as Special POCSO Case No. 26/2021 and pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Kokrajhar. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the trial has almost been completed as all the depositions are over, including the examination of the victim and the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and the case is posted for arguments. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody for about 610 days since 16.06.2026. 4. The scanned copy is available. 5. The prosecution and the learned counsel or the respondent No.2 do not dispute that the prosecution evidence is complete and the case is still at the state of argument. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the argument stage of the case has not progressed as the learned special Judge is on long leave. Upon considering the stage of the trial and the length of detention, I am inclined to consider the prayer for bail. 7. Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioner, named above, shall be Page No.# 3/3 released on bail of Rs.50,000/- with two suitable surety of like amount, one of which should be from Gossaigaon Sub-Division, to the satisfaction of concerned learned court, subject to the following conditions that the petitioners: (a) shall not abscond and be available for the remaining trial. (b) Shall not intimidate or harass or harm the informant/victim side or any witnesses. 8. Violation of the bail conditions entails cancellation of bail. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant