Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25805 (GAU)

DHANANJOY BASUMATARY v. THE UNION OF INDIA and 3 ORS.

WP(C)/7172/2017 · 2025-12-01

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010051422017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7172/2017 DHANANJOY BASUMATARY S/O. SH. ACHIRI BASUMATARY, VILL. SHYMRALI, P.O. LONGHIM TINIALI, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM-782441. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA and 3 ORS. REP. BY THE SECRETARY THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI-110001. 2:DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ASSAM RIFLES SHILLONG MEGHALAYA-11. 3:THE COMMANDER 7 SECTOR ASSAM RIFLES C/O. 99 A.P.O. 4:THE COMMANDANT 44TH ASSAM RIFLES C/O. 99 A.P.O Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.S BORA, MS.B DAS Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., MR.C K S BARUAH,C.G.C. Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 02.12.2025 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petitioner expired during the pendency of the writ petition, and the said fact was communicated to the counsel for the petitioner by the spouse of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the legal heirs of the petitioner are not desirous of pursuing the writ petition any further In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands closed. However, liberty is granted to the legal heirs to file appropriate application if they so desire. Interim order if any stands vacated. Pending IAs if any are also dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant