SADANAND SINGH AND 4 OTHERS v. NARENDAR SINGH @ BASANT KUMAR SINGH AND 6 OTHERS
A227/3104/2025 · 2025-04-16
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25800 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25800 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:56455 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3104 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sadanand Singh And 4 Others Respondent :- Narendar Singh @ Basant Kumar Singh And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suman Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent :- Anil Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. In Re: Civil Misc. Amendment Application No. 2 of 2025 Through this amendment application, petitioners want to incorporate the prayer for challenging the compromise decree. A preliminary objection has been raised by respondent counsel to the amendment application on the ground that it is not maintainable under Order XXIII Rule 3 as the compromise decree cannot be challenged before this Court in Matters under Article 227 of Constitution of India.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she is not pressing the amendment application and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of her grievance. In view of statement so made, the amendment application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. In Re: Petition As the amendment application has been rejected, the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of said fact, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 17.4.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad