- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1862 RPFC No. 100003 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100003 OF 2025 (-) BETWEEN: C. BASAVARAJ S/O NARAYANAMMA AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. WARD NO.4, SEETARAM NAGAR, NEAR HULIGEMMA TEMPLE, SIDDAMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. KURUGODU, DIST. BALLARI-583115. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASAVANA GOUD T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SHAKUNTALA W/O C.BASAVARAJ AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. ANGANAWADI WORKER, R/O. WARD NO.4, SEETARAM NAGAR, NEAR HULIGEMMA TEMPLE, SIDDAMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. KURUGODU, DIST. BALLARI. NOW RESIDING AT GADDE BASAVESHWAR NILAYA WARD NO.13, INDIRA NAGAR, BALLARI ROAD, BEHIND IRRIGATION OFFICE, KURUGODU, KURUGODU TQ, BALLARI DIST-583115. 2. KUMARI INDU D/O C. BASAVARAJ AGE. 16 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, SINCE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER SMT. SHAKUNTALA W/O C.BASAVARAJ R/O. WARD NO.4, SEETARAM NAGAR, NEAR HULIGEMMA TEMPLE, SIDDAMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. KURUGODU, DIST. BALLARI. NOW RESIDING AT GADDE BASAVESHWAR NILAYA WARD NO.13,INDIRA NAGAR, BALLARI ROAD, BEHIND IRRIGATION OFFICE, KURUGODU, TOWN, KURUGODU, BALLARI DIST-583115. …RESPONDENTS MANJANNA E Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Date: 2025.02.04 11:02:54 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1862 RPFC No. 100003 of 2025 THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO, SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 07.10.2024 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT, BALLARI IN CRL.MISC.NO.158/2024 BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is assailing the order dated 07.10.2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No.158/2024 on the file of Principal Judge, Family Court, Ballari (for short, hereinafter referred to as ‘Family Court’), awarding monthly maintenance of Rs.4,000/- each to the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 respectively. 3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Family Court. 4. Taking into consideration the fact that the relationship between the parties is not disputed and the marriage between the petitioner No.1 and the respondent was solemnized on 11.05.2007 and in their wedlock petitioner No.2 - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1862 RPFC No. 100003 of 2025 – daughter is born. It is also forthcoming from the finding recoded by the Family Court that the parties are residing separately. 5. In that view of the matter, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners are residing at kurugudo town, Ballari, I am of the view that the grant of maintenance by the Family Court is just and proper and no interference is called for in this petition. 6. Accordingly, petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SMM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 39