NAZIM UDDIN LASKAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
WP(C)/4875/2025 · 2026-02-10
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2580 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2580 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010185992025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4875/2025 NAZIM UDDIN LASKAR S/O LATE AZIR UDDIN LASKAR, VILL- CHIPARSANGAN PART-I, P.O.- CHIPARSANGAN, DISST- HAILAKANDI (ASSAM) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE ASSAM ARANYA BHAWAN PANJABARI GUWAHATI-37 3:THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS SOUTHERN ASSAM CIRCLE SILCHAR-01 4:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER HAILAKANDI FOREST DIVISION HAILAKANDI PIN-78815 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A H M R CHOUDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST,
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 11-02-2026 Mr. A.H.M.R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted on instruction, that since the petitioner got the relief during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ petition any further. He has further submitted that he has accordingly informed to the learned Standing Counsel, Forest Department. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant