The PHED Work Charged Workers Organization Ukhrul v. Puneet Kumar Geol and 2 ors
CONT CAS(C)/142/2025 · 2026-05-25
Ahanthem Bimol Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 258 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 258 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Cont. Cas No. 142 of 2025 MC (Cont. Cas (C)) No. 38 of 2026
Page 1
Item Nos. 44 & 45 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
Cont. Cas (C) No. 142 of 2025 MC (Cont. Cas (C) No. 38 of 2026
The PHED Work Charged Workers Organization, Ukhrul …Petitioner/s Vrs. Puneet Kumar Goel; & 2 Ors. …Respondent/s
-B E F O R E- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 26.05.2026
Mr. Lungmi Ragu, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. I. Bimola, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the respondents. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the respondents have duly complied with the direction given by this Court in its order dated 06.02.2025 passed in WP (C) No. 235 of 2023 by issuing Office Order No. 04 dated 15.04.2026. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents accordingly submitted that the present contempt case as well as the connected miscellaneous application can be closed. Mr. Lungmi Ragu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not satisfied with the order passed by the authority and as such, the petitioner may be given liberty to challenge the same. KABORAM BAM SAPANA CHANU Digitally signed by KABORAMBAM SAPANA CHANU Date: 2026.05.27 11:26:41 +05'30'
Cont. Cas No. 142 of 2025 MC (Cont. Cas (C)) No. 38 of 2026
Page 2
In view of the submission made above, the present contempt case as well as the connected application are hereby closed. Needless to say that the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Office Order No. 04 dated 15.04.2026 by filing appropriate writ petition.
JUDGE Sapana