Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010219302025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5719/2025 UNITED DRILLING TOOLS LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 139A, FIRST FLOOR, ANTRIKSH BHAWAN, 22 KASTURBA GANDHI MARG, NEW DELHI 110001.HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE ADDRESS AT 26TH FLOOR, ASTRALIS TOWER, SUPERNOVA COMPLEX, SECTOR - 94, NOIDA 201301 DISTRICT G B NAGAR, UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA, REP. BY THE AUTHORISED REP. SRI SHASHANK AGARWAL, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDENT OF E 406, NARWANA APARTMENT, IP EXTENSION, EAST DELHI DELHI 110092 VERSUS OIL INDIA LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT DULIAJAN, IN THE DISTRICT OF DIBRUGARH, ASSAM 786602, REP BY THE RESIDENT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OIL INDIA LTD, DULIAJAN, DIBRUGARH, ASSAM 2:THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR C AND P OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN ASSAM 786602. 3:GENERAL MANAGER MATERIAL HOD MATERIALS DEPARTMENT OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN ASSAM - 786602 Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the petitioner(s): Ms. D Das Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. K Kalita for the respondent OIL B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 16.12.2025 Ms. D Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that against the order dated 10.10.2025, the petitioner has already approached the appellate authority. 2. The learned counsel further submits that though the petitioner was blacklisted, but there was no answer in the affidavit-in-opposition insofar as the challenge to the communication dated 02.07.2025. 3. However, Mr. K Kalita, the learned Standing Counsel of the OIL submitted that as regards the contract with the petitioner dated 03.03.2025 the same had already been cancelled and in that regard a communication has been placed before this Court dated 12.12.2025. The same is kept on record and marked with the letter ‘X’. 4. Ms. D Das, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, therefore, would not like to further press the instant writ petition, but the withdrawal of the instant writ petition should not prejudice the petitioner to assail the communication dated 12.12.2025, if so advised. Page No.# 3/3 5. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition, therefore, stands closed. 6. The closure of the instant writ petition, however, shall not prejudice the petitioner to assail the communication dated 12.12.2025, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant