221. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Sukhvinder Kaur State of Punjab CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL 1. under Section under Section District SAS Nagar (Mohali). 2. following submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court had granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner and asked her to join investigation: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: Sukhvinder Kaur Versus State of Punjab HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Nilesh Kant Goyal, Advocate, for Mr. G.P.S. Ghuman, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, Senior DAG, Punjab Mr. Ajay Kamboj, Advocate, Mr. Gurpreet, Advocate and Mr. Gurbinder Pal Singh, Advocate, for Ms. Amarjit Kaur Khurana, Advocate, for ----- MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking the concession of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, in FIR No.0 under Section 406, 420, 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station District SAS Nagar (Mohali). On the last date of hearing i.e. following submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court had granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner and asked to join investigation:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner, that a perusal of the FIR in question clearly reveals that it is on account of the marriage between the daughter of the petitioner and son of the complainant turning sour that exaggerated IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8252-2025 Date of decision: 19.05.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondent HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Nilesh Kant Goyal, Advocate, for , Advocate, for the petitioner. Senior DAG, Punjab. Mr. Gurbinder Pal Singh, Advocate, for Ms. Amarjit Kaur Khurana, Advocate, for the complainant. seeking the concession of anticipatory bail, in FIR No.0094, dated 10.10.2024, , registered at Police Station Banur, i.e. 13.02.2025, while noticing the following submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court had granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner and asked Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that a perusal of the FIR in question clearly reveals that it is on account of the marriage between the daughter of the petitioner and son of the complainant turning sour that exaggerated , .2024, Banur, while noticing the following submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court had granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner and asked , contends that a perusal of the FIR in question clearly reveals that it is on account of the marriage between the daughter of the petitioner SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.05.20 08:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-8252-2025 - 2 - allegations have been levelled for reasons but obvious. It has also been submitted that daughter of the petitioner, after her marriage with son of the complainant, had also obtained emergency protective order in USA, against the complainant in July 2024, after being threatened.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 13.02.2025, the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. 4. Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation much less for her custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 13.02.2025, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) of BNSS, 2023. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE May 19, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.05.20 08:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document