[2025:RJ-JP:32966] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9666/2025 Rajmohan S/o Mithalal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Bichli Patti, Bamanwas Thana Bamanwas, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. At Present In Central Jail Sawaimadhopur ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP and Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun, Adv., with Ms. Manju Chauhan, Adv., for complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.262/2011 registered at Police Station Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 302 of IPC. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that on the basis of same evidence, other co-accused persons were tried and acquitted by the learned Court below. He further submits that now, petitioner has been arrest in this case. He argues that trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that the petitioner is in custody since 29.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:32966] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9666/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, but fairly concedes that other co-accused persons, on the basis of same evidence, have been acquitted by the learned Court below. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that other co-accused persons have been acquitted by the learned Court below and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Rajmohan S/o Mithalal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/171