Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2579 (CAL)

SOUVIK MAJUMDER v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/18739/2025 · 2026-02-23

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

136 2233..0022..22002266 Ct. No. 02 adeb WPA 18739 of 2025 Sri Souvik Majumder Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Partha Sarathi Bhattacharyya Mr. Raju Bhattacharyya Mr. Arunava Maiti …for the petitioner Mr. Jahar Lal De Mr. Kaustav Bhattacharya …for the State Mr. Bratin Kumar Dey …for the High Court Administration 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. At the time of call Mr. Partha Sarathi Bhattacharyya, learned senior advocate representing the petitioner submits that writ petition has become infructuous in view of disposal of the appeal preferred by the petitioner in terms of Rule 49 of the West Bengal District Court (Constitution of Service, Recruitment, Appointment, Probation and Discipline of Employees) Rules, 2015. 3. On behalf of the petitioner copy of memo of the learned Registrar General, High Court, Calcutta dated 23rd December, 2025 addressed 2 to the petitioner is placed before this Court and same is taken on record. 4. From the said memo dated 23rd December, 2025 it appears that appeal preferred by the petitioner was rejected by the decision dated 2nd December, 2025 of the Hon’ble Administrative Committee which was approved by the Full Court by circulation. 5. In view of disposal of the appeal writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. 6. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to take steps in accordance with law against the order passed in appeal preferred by the petitioner. 7. It is made clear that Court has not decided the issue on merit. 8. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)