Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25788 (CHH)

RAJKUMAR DEWANGAN v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5118/2019 · 2025-07-13

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:32591 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5118 of 2019 1 - Rajkumar Dewangan S/o Late Narayan Dewangan Aged About 62 Years Occupation Forest Guard (Retired) From The Department Of Forest, R/o Kariyatola, Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 2 - Pandhari Ram S/o Shri M. Bansod Aged About 62 Years Occupation Forest Guard (Retired) Department Of Forest, R/o Village Munjal, Post Bhadsena, Via Ambagarh Chowki, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ramnath S/o Shri Rupram Sahu Aged About 62 Years Occupation Chowkidar (Retired) Department Of Forest, R/o Village Mariya, Ward No. 10, Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Chandra Bai Wd/o Late Kalyan Singh Aged About 62 Years Occupation Chowkidar (Retired) Department Of Forest, R/o Village Banjari, Tahsil Daundilohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest And Environmental, Mantralaya, Mahanandi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, 2 - The Conservator Of Forest Department Of Forest, Rajnandgaon Division, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Divisional Forest Officer Territorial Jurisdiction Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Petitioners : Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. Ritesh Giri, Panel Lawyer. 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 14/07/2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, as per instructions given by petitioner No.1, the reliefs sought for by petitioners have been granted to them by respondent authorities and they have received gratuity and also receiving pension, therefore, this petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of above, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Rukhsar RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2025.07.15 15:32:39 +0530