Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25785 (AP)

G. SOWDAMANI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/18543/2024 · 2025-07-30

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010364142024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 18543/2024 Between: 1. G. SOWDAMANI, W/O G.SUBRAMANYAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/O 20-2-496-A, MARUTHI NAGAR, KORLAGUNTA, TIRUPATHI (URBAN) TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 3. GRAMA PANCHAYAT PERUMALLA PALLI, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, PERUMALLA PALLI, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4. TIRUPATHI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP BY ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 6 in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring S.NO.430/2A1 of Pudipatia village and keeping the board in the above land preventing the petitioner to alienate her land by the respondents 2 and 3 as illegal, arbitrary and without any authority and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 6 not to interfere with possession, enjoyment and sale of the above land by the petitioner and not to put up any board in the above land, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 6 not to interfere with possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the land in S.No.430/2A1 an extent of Ac.1-00 situated at Pudipatia village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead us as respondent Nos.7 & 8 in W.P.No.18543 of 2024 as well as in the lA’s and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. KOMMASANI SRINIVASULA REDDY SC FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES 3. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 18543/2024 ORDER: Ms. Sree Deepthi, the learned counsel representing Sri P. Ganga Rami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, he filed a letter in the Registry dated 30.07.2025, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 31.07.2025 SSCCHH 4 219 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.18543 OF 2024 31.07.2025 SSCCHH