l`\\ a+I. lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMJ FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE : PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7523 OF 2025 [3521 I Between : Boggu Naganji alias Naganjaneyulu, S/o. Boggu Chinna Subbarayudu, Aged about 28 years, R/o P. Bommepalli Vl-Ilage, Jammalamadugu MandaI, YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. Petitioner/Accused (A6) AND The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep. By its, Public Prosecutor, High Court of . Andhra Pradesh, Nelapadu, Amaravathi Respondent f- Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/Accused (A6) on, Regular Bail in connection with F.I.R No. 319 of 2025 on the file of Jammalamadugu U/G Police Station, YSR Kadapa DistrllCt, Dated: ll-05-2025 for alleged offences u/s 191(2),191(3),115(2),118(1 ),109(1 ),103(1) r/w 190'' BNS. COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: Sri M. Siva Prasad COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Public Prosecutor. The Court made the following I., APHCO10364502025 fiFFILl IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CR]M[NAL PETITION NO: 7523/2025 Between : BOGGU NAGANJI ALIAS NAGANJANEYULU, S/O BOGGU CHINNA SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,R/O P.BOMMEPALLI VILLAGE, JAMMALAMADUGU MANDAL, YSRKADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. By its, Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh, Nelapadu, Amaravathi ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused.- MEDARA SIVA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following.I ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under sections 437 and 439 of the Code of Crl-minaI Procedure, 1973 (for brevity fthe Cr.P.C.I)/ 2 Dr. YLR, J CrI.P.No.7523 of 2025 Dated 25.07.2025 sections 480 and 483 of the BharatI|ya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity [{he BNSSJ), seeking {o enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.6 on bail in cr.No.319 of 2025 of J.Madugu Police Station, Y,S.R.District, registered against the petl-tioner/Accused No.6 herein for the offences Punishable under Sections 191(1),191 (3),115 (2),118 (1),109 (1),103 read with 190 of the BharatI'ya Nyaya SanhI'ta, 2023 (for brevity tthe BNS') 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 10.05.2025, at about 3.'30 P.M., a dispute arose between the accused and the de-facto complainant regardI-ng the sprinkling of dung water in front of theI'r houses. In connectI'On With this dispute, Accused Nos. 1 to 8 formed an unlawful assembly, armed with sticks, and attacked the deceased, the de-facto complainant, and six of their relatives, causing severe bleeding injuries. The injured were shifted to the Government Hospital, Jammalamadugu. While the deceased was being shifted to Hyderabad for better treatment, he succumbed to the injuries on the way the deceased was dI'ed. Based on the complaint, a case was registered, and Accused No. 6 was remanded to judicial custody on 23.05.2025. 3. Sri M. Siva Prasad, the learned counsel forthe petitioner, submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence; he I-S falsely implicated 3 + Dr. YLR, I CrI.P.No.7523 of 2025 Dated 25.07.2025 in this case; he is the sole breadwinner of his family; he is ready to abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in the galata, the petitioner also suffered a head injury and underwent treatment at Hari Kishore Neuro, Spine & E.N.T. Care, Proddatur; to that effect, a doctor's certificate is appended. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is also a victim in the gala{a and has been suffering from 9 rr neuro problem in the Sub-Jail, Jam+,lmalamadugu, for the past 60 days, and it is urged to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 4. Per contra, Ms. P. Akila Naidu, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, opposed the grant of bail, stating that some more material witnesses have to be examined; the investigation is not yet completed; and l'f the petitioner is enlarged on bail, he may not be available for investigation and may escape from the clutches of law. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor further submits that there are three injured in this case who suffered grievous inju-Ties; one Raja Chowdappa sustained fatal injuries and was admitted to the hospital on 10.05.2025 and died on ll.05,2025 whI'le undergoing treatment, The petitioner/Accused No.6 is the main perpetrator, and it is urged to. dismiss the bail application. 4 Dr. YLR, J CrI.P.No.7523 of 2025 Dated 25.07.2025 5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AssI'Stant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 6. As seen from the case record, the petitioner is shown as Accused No.6 in the FIR. The allegation levelled against him is that he also beat the deceased and the injured persons with hI'S hands and legs. The petitioner was arrested on 23.05.2025 and he has been in judicial custody for the past 60 days. It is reported that the petitioner suffered a head injury I-n the galata. He is aged about 28 years and is suffering from a severe neuro problem due to the injury sustained during the gala[a. 7. Considering the gravity and nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the alleged role played by him, the relatively mild overt acts attributed to him, and the period of detention already undergone by him in judicial custody, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the petitioner on bail with certain stringent conditI'OnS. 8. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following conditions: i. The petitioner/Accused No.6 shall be enlarged on bail subject to he executing a personal bond for a sum of 5 Dr. YLR, J CrI.P.No.7523 of 2O25 Dated 25.07.2O25 Rs.1O,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial First class Magistrate, Jammalamadugu. ii. The petitioner/Accused No.6 shall not leave the limits of the District without prior permission from the Investigating Officer till the filing of the charge sheet. iii. The petitioner/Accused No.6 shall not commit or indulge in similar offences in future. iv. The petitioner/Accused No.6 shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses; iv. The petitioner/Accused No.6 shall cooperate with the investigating officer in further investigation of the case and shall be available to the investigating officer as and when called by him. //TRUE COPY// , ASSssD:::TTB:-!T:Ai?icEAR:OAR For To, 1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Jammalamadugu, YSR Kadapa District. I- 2. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Jammalamadugu, YSR Kadapa District. 3. The Station House Officer, Jammalamadugu U/G. Police Station, YSR Kadapa District. 4. Two CCs Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi (OUT) 5. One CC to Sri Medara Siva Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One spare copy KSV HIGH COURT Dr. YLRJ DATE: 25-07-2025 OREER CRLP NO. 7523 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION