APHC010364192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18486/2025 Between: 1. CHEBROLU KRISHNAVENI,, W/O.VENGALA RAO, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE-WIFE, R/O.D.NO.20-3-265/1,4TH LINE, GOWTHAMI NAGAR, KORITEPADU, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGARAMPALEM POLICE STATION, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. CHEBROLU VENGALA RAO, S/O.VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO-6-7, MALAKONDARAYUNIPALEM VILLAGE, LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 523113. 5. CHEBROLU MALAKONDAIAH, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT YEARS R/O.D.NO-6-7, MALAKONDARAYUNIPALEM VILLAGE, LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 523113 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not taking action against on the petitioners complaint, dated 30- 06-2025 with regard to cognizable offence committed by the 4th and 5th respondents inspite of law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court of India in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Govt, of A.P. and others as illegal, arbitrary, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provision of Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023 and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to take necessary action on the petitioners complaint, dated 30-06- 2025 with regard to cognizable offence committed by the 4th and 5th respondents in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 2nd & 3rdrespondents to take action on the petitioners complaint, dated 30-06-2025 with regard to cognizable offence committed by the 4th & 5th respondents in accordance with law, pending disposal of the present writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DAGGUBATI RAMASWAMY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not taking action against on the petitioners complaint, dated 30- 06-2025 with regard to cognizable offence committed by the 4th and 5th respondents inspite of law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court of India in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Govt, of A.P. and others as illegal, arbitrary, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provision of Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023 and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to take necessary action on the petitioners complaint, dated 30-06- 2025 with regard to cognizable offence committed by the 4th and 5th respondents in accordance with law and pass……” 2. Sri D.Ramaswamy Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the instructions from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to recourse his remedy before the appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.07.2025 MH 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 103 WRIT PETITION NO: 18486/2025 Dt.25.07.2025 MH