Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25779 (JHR)

VINOD KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6374/2024 · 2025-05-09

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14001 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.6374 of 2024 ------ 1. Vinod Kumar 2. Ganita Kumari. … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Smt. Shraswati Gope … … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ritesh Kumar Pathak, Advocate For the State : Ms. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P. Ms. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. ----- 07/ 09.05.2025 This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Potka P.S. Case No.65 of 2021, G.R. No.1139 of 2023 for offences under Sections 406, 420, 34, 120B IPC. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamshedpur. 2. The case is under Section 406 and 420 IPC, where the punishment is up to seven years. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State submits that the petitioners have cooperated in the investigation and charge sheet has also been submitted against the petitioners. 4. Since the charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners, there is no apprehension of the petitioners being arrested. 5. The petitioners are directed to appear before the Court concerned. 6. With the aforesaid observation, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3