Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010232022023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3266/2023 RUNU BORA @BORAH and 6 ORS W/O LATE BHASKAR JYOTI BORA @ BHASKAR BORA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RADHALA, PS RAHA, DSIT NAGAON, ASSAM 782103 2: NABANITA BORA D/O LATE BHASKAR JYOTI BORA @ BHASKAR BORA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RADHALA PS RAHA DSIT NAGAON ASSAM 782103 3: ALPANA BORA D/O LATE BHASKAR JYOTI BORA @ BHASKAR BORA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RADHALA PS RAHA DSIT NAGAON ASSAM 782103 4: PARTHA PRATIM BORA S/O LATE BHASKAR JYOTI BORA @ BHASKAR BORA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RADHALA PS RAHA DSIT NAGAON ASSAM 782103 TO BE REP. BY PET. NO. 1 5: LILIMAI BORA @ BORAH W/O DIMBESWAR BORA @ BORAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RADHALA PS RAHA Page No.# 2/3 DSIT NAGAON ASSAM 782103 6: DIMBESWAR BORA @ BORAH S/O LATE CHENIRAM BORA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RADHALA PS RAHA DSIT NAGAON ASSAM 782103 7: BORASHA RANI BORAH D/O DIMBESWAR BORA @ BORAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RADHALA PS RAHA DSIT NAGAON ASSAM 78210 VERSUS RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND 2 ORS. ANIL PLAZA. 5TH FLOOR, GS ROAD, ABC, NEAR IDBI BANK, SATSANG BIHAR, BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI, 781005, DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM 2:TRIPTI SAIKIA W/O SATRAM SAIKIA VILLAGE AND PO RUPAHITALI GAON PS RAHA DIST NAGAON ASSAM 782103 3:MILAN CH. BORA S/O RUPRAM BORA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GURUKHUNDA PS KAMPUR DIST NAGAON ASSAM 78242 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R AGARWALA, MD. K ALI,MS. R LAILA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K K BHATTA(R-1), MS L SHARMA(R-1) Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER 10.12.2025 The present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is filed praying for condonation of delay of 131 days in preferring the connected appeal against the impugned Judgment and Order dated 07.02.2023 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal no. 2, Kamrup [M], Guwahati [‘the Tribunal’] in MAC Case no. 707/2020. Heard Mr. A.R. Agarwala, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. L. Sharma, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1. The main reasons for the delay which has occurred in preferring the connected appeal has been reflected in paragraph nos. 4, 5 & 6 of the application. This Court has gone through paragraph nos. 4, 5 & 6 of the application and has found that sufficient cause for delay has been shown. Accordingly, the delay of 131 days which has occurred in preferring the connected appeal is condoned. The interlocutory application stands allowed. The Registry shall register the appeal and thereafter list the appeal for admission hearing on 15.12.2025. JUDGE Comparing Assistant