Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25773 (KAR)

SRI KRISHNA @ KRISHNAPPA v. SRI RAMESH.B

MFA/5120/2014 · 2025-04-29

Venkatesh Naik T

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17910 MFA No. 5120 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5120 OF 2014 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SRI KRISHNA @ KRISHNAPPA S/O SRI.CHANNAPPA, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, 2. SMT. VARALAKSHMI W/O SRI.KRISHNA @ KRISHNAPPA, AGED 30 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE ALL ARE RESIDING AT: NO.1557, 'A' BLOCK, SUBHASH NAGAR, BEGURU HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 068. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. SMITHA, ADV. FOR SRI. SURESH M. LATUR., ADV.) AND: 1. SRI RAMESH.B S/O SRI. BALU REDDY, NO.42, 1ST MAIN, BALAJINAGAR, B.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 068. 2. SRI. SRINIVAS.R S/O SRI. RAJAPPA R/O NO.151, GARVEBHAVI PALYA, HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 068. Digitally signed by MOUNESHWARAPPA NAGARATHNA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17910 MFA No. 5120 of 2014 3. THE REGIONAL MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., 5TH AND 6TH FLOOR, KRISHI BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, HUDSON CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. Y. V. RADHA KRISHNA, ADV. FOR R2, SRI. O. MAHESH, ADV. FOR R3, R1 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED.) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 04.03.2014 PASSED IN MVC NO.2798/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE & XXXIII ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel Sri. Suresh M. Latur, for the appellants is appearing through Video conference and Smt. Smitha, learned counsel representing Sri. Suresh M. Latur, for the appellants is present before the Court physically and files a memo stating that the matter between the appellants and respondents is settled out of Court and hence the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17910 MFA No. 5120 of 2014 In view of the memo and the supporting submissions, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE MN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23