2025:JHHC:30219 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9003 of 2025 --------- Amit Kumar, aged about 27 years, son of Shyambabu Singh, resident of Village: Mirganj, PO: Mirganj, PS: Ara Town, District-Ara (Bihar). ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-26.09.2025 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 318(4)/338/336 (3)/340(2)/292/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Section 7 of the Lottery Regulation Act, Section 3/4 of the Public Gambling Act and Section 66 B and 66 C of the Information Technology Act in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No.173 of 2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He submits that the charge-sheet has already been submitted. He further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedents and for no offence he has been languishing in custody since 30.05.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that he has got no criminal antecedents and the petitioner is in custody since 30.05.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No.173 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-