IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.6345 of 2024 ------ 1. Imtiyaj Alam @ Md. Imtiyaz Alam, aged about 25 years, son of Sirajul Haque, resident of School Muhalla, Khalran Toli, P.O. and P.S. Simdega, District Simdega (Jharkhand). 2. Irfan Khan @ Erfan Khan, aged about 23 years, son of Md. Nasim Khan, resident of Simdega, Khairan Toli, P.O. and P.S. Simdega, District Simdega (Jharkhand) 3. Osama @ Md. Osama Alam, aged about 21 years, son of Md. Nesar, resident of Khairan Toli Talab Muhalla, P.O. and P.S. Simdega, District Simdega (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.05 Dated- 12-03-2025 I.A. No.3146 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of the instant anticipatory bail application. Since, the hearing of instant anticipatory bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) A.B.A. No.6345 of 2024 Apprehending their arrest in connection with T. Tanger P.S. Case No.24 of 2024 instituted under Sections 341, 342, 307, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant by firing upon him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is further submitted that no injury has been sustained by anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.30,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Simdega in connection with T. Tanger P.S. Case No.24 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/