Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25764 (RAJ)

SMT SUSHILA DAREYA v. SURENDRA MEENA ANDORS

CW/2006/2016 · 2025-01-22

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3139] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2006/2016 Smt Sushila Daeya W/o Sh. Radhakrishna Daeya, Aged 59 years, R/o 71/1, Gandhi Nagar, Churu Through Power of Attorney Sarika Singh R/o Choudhary Krishi Farm, Deedwana Road, Kuchaman City Distt. Nagaur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Surendra Meena S/o Sh. Laxminaraya Meena 2. Ajay Kumar S/o Sh. Laxminaraya Meena Both R/o B-24 Vivekanand Colony, Naya Khera, Ambabari Jaipur 3. Devanshu Meena S/o Sh. Ramji Lal Meena, R/o X-16 Patliputra Enclave Bidavat Marge, Ambabari Jaipur 4. Shankar Lal S/o Sh. Gopal R/o 96 Agunabas, Shyampura dataramgarh Distt. Sikar Presently address E-652 RPA Colony, Shastri Nagar Jaipur 5. Naresh Kumar S/o Sh. Sheeshram R/o Gram Sunari Post Sefraguwar Khetri Distt. Jhunjhunu Presently R/o U-48 Balaji Vihar-6 Benar Road Jaipur ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : None HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 22/01/2025 None has put in appearance for the petitioner. Petitioner has challenged the order dated 23.01.2016 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge No. 10, Jaipur Metro Jaipur in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 126/15 whereby the appellate Court while allowing the appeal filed by the respondents, set aside the order dated 07.11.2015 passed by the trial Court whereby the [2025:RJ-JP:3139] (2 of 2) [CW-2006/2016] trial Court directed both the parties to maintain status quo over the land in dispute. This Court vide order dated 26.02.2016 directed both the parties to maintain status with regard to the land in dispute. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly in view of the fact that the suit was filed before the trial Court in the year 2015 and more than 9 years have been passed therefrom, without interfering with the impugned order, I dispose this petition with a direction to the trial Court to the decide the suit, if pending with it, expeditiously in accordance with law. The interim order dated 26.02.2016 passed by this court shall continue till disposal of the suit. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Ritu/154