" r I APHC010363182025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) B ( MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18202 OF 2025 I, ■) i ■V Between: 1. Turaga Jithendra Achyutha Bhargav, S/o Venkata Sree Rama Chandra Murthy Hindu, Brahmin by Caste, Aged about 31 years. Self Employee of Auditing, R/o D. No. 1-429, 1st Street, Somanivari Thota, Bommuru village - 533 124, Rajamundry Rural, East Godavari District 2. Turaga Venkata Sree Rama Paramahamsa, Retired VRO, Chandra Murthy, S/o A.R.K. Hindu, Brahmin by Caste, Aged about 66 R/o D. No. 1-429, 1st Street, Somanivari Thota years. Bommuru village - 533 124, Rajamundry Rural East Godavari District 3. Turaga Bhaskara Subba Lakshmi @ Vimala, W/o Venkata Sree Rama Chandra Murthy, Hindu, Brahmin by Caste, Aged about 56 House wife, R/o D. No. 1-429, 1st Street, Somanivari Thota village - 533 124, Rajamundry Rural, East Godavari District 4. Turaga Reshma Raja Hamsa, W/o V.S.R.A. Prakash, years. Bommuru Hindu, Brahmin by Caste, Aged about 33 years. House wife, R/o D. No. 102-1-395, 1st Street, Somanivari Thota Bommuru village - 533 124, Rajamundry Rural, East Godavari District ...Petitioners AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Home) Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. Sub Inspector of Police, Town Police Station Bapatia, Bapatia District 3. Inspector of Police C I, Town Police Station Bapatia, Bapatia District 4. Sub Division Police Officer DSP, Bapatia, Bapatia District 5. Turaga Gayathri Naga Subba Lakshmi, W/o Jithendra Achyutha Bhargav, D/o Valluru Parthasaradhi, Aged about 27 years. House wife, Thyagaraya Nagar, Bapatia, Bapatia District Hindu, Brahmin by Caste, R/o D. No. WB-3-235, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 2 to 4 in interfering into the life and liberty of the petitioners and calling into the Town police station, Bapatia and threatening to settle the matrimonial dispute in terms of money with respondents No. 5 and creating panic situation and detaining the petitioners in the police station is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of principles of natural justice and also violation Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 not to interfere into the lives and liberty as well as matrimonial dispute of the petitioners in respect of the 1 st petitioners marital dispute and that, not to call them into the police station and not to threaten them and not to settle the matrimonial dispute with respondent No. 5 and not to create panic situation and detain the petitioners into the police station and such other relief or reliefs as this Honble Court may deem fit and properfor the circumstance of the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondents No. 2 to 4 that not to interfere into the lives and liberty Of the petitioners as well as in matrimonial disputes of the 1st petitioner and that not to call them into the police station and not to threaten them not to settle the matrimonial disputes with respondent No. 5 in terms of detain the petitioners into the and money and not to create panic situation and police station and such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper for the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI R Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 K ACHARYULU to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: APHC010363182025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No.18202/2025 Between: 1.TURAGA JITHENDRA ACHYUTHA BHARGAV, S/0 VENKATA SREE RAMA CHANDRA MURTHY, HINDU, BRAHMIN BY CASTE, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS. SELF EMPLOYEE OF AUDITING, R/0 D. NO. 1- 429, 1ST STREET, SOMANIVARI THOTA, BOMMURU VILLAGE - 533 124, RAJAMUNDRY RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2.. TURAGA VENKATA SREE RAMA CHANDRA MURTHY, S/0 A.R.K. PARAMAHAMSA, HINDU, BRAHMIN BY CASTE, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. RETIRED VRO, R/0 D. NO. 1-429, 1®“^ STREET, SOMANIVARI THOTA, BOMMURU VlLL/\GE- 533 124, RAJAMUNDRY RURAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3.TU,RAGA BHASKARA SUBBA LAKSHMi @ VIMALA, W/0 VENK.^TA SREE RAMA CHANDRA MURTHY, HINDU, BRAHMIN BY CASTE, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE, R/0 D. NO. 1-429, 1ST STREET, SOMANIVARI THOTA, BOMMURU VILLAGE - 533 124, RAJAMUNDRY RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4.TURAGA RESHMA RAJA HAMSA, W/O V.S.R.A. PRAKASH, HINDU, BRAHMIN BY CASTE, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. HOUSE Y/IFE, R/0 D. NO. 102-1-395, 1ST STREET, SOMAMiVARJ THOTA, BOMMURU VILLAGE - 533 124, RAJAMUNDRY RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PET!TIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. 3Y ITS ^RINC-iPAL SECRETARY (HOME) SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDl, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT 3.INSPECTOR OF POLICE C L, TOWN POLICE STATION BAPATL.A, BAPATLA DISTRICT 4. SUB DIVISION POLICE OFFICER DSP, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT 5.TIJRAGA GAYATHRI NAGA SUBBA LAKSHMI, W/O JITHENDRA ACHYUTHA BLiARGAV, D/0 VAL.LURU PARTHASARADHf, HiNDlL 2 BRAHMiN BY CASTE, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE R/0 D. NO. WB-3-235, THYAGARAYA NAGAR, DISTr^xiCT BAPATIA, BAPATIA ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.R KACHARYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 2 to 4 in interfering into the life and liberty of the petitioners and calling into the Town Police Station, Bapatia and threatening to settle the matrimonial dispute in terms of money with respondents No. 5 and creating panic situation and detaining the petitioners in the police station is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of principles of natural justice and also violation Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 not to interfere into the lives and liberty as well as matrimonial dispute of the petitioners in respect of the 1st petitioners marital dispute and that, not to call them into the police station and not to threaten them and not to settle the matrimonial dispute with respondent No. 5 and not to create! panic situation and detain the petitioners into the police station and such other relief or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper for the circumstance of the case. ” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, based on the complaint lodged by Respondent No.5, a case in Crime No.281 of 2025 on the file of Bapatia Town Police Station for the offence under Section 85 read with 3(5) of BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, has been registered and the investigation is going on and notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS has to be served against the Petitioners. 3 Sri R.K.Acharyulu, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit the Court may pass appropriate orders, 4. Considering the However, the Police are Section 35(3) of BNSS. There shall be no order as to costs, sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand 3. submissions made, the Writ Petition iS disposed of. directed to follow the procedure contemplated under As a closed. Sd/- N. NAGAMWA assistant registrar SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Principal Secretary (Home) 1. The Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. Sub Inspector of Police, Town Police Station Bapatla, Bapatla District Police Station Bapatla, Bapatla District Officer DSP, Bapatla, Bapatla District 3. Inspector of Police C I, Town 4. Sub Division Police 5. One CC to Sri. R K Acharyulu, Advocate [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CCS to GP For Home, 7. Two CD Copies. AL HIGH COURT DATED:21/07/2025 ^roF ANO/^ ORDER WP NO. 18202 OF 2025 -s 0 2 AUG 2025 c>v as m % ^/J Current Section DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS