KAMAL BRIJMOHAN MANIYAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
CA/9903/2025 · 2025-09-22
Shri Manish Pitale, Shri Y G Khobragade
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25755 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25755 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
18-CA-9903-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 18 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9903 OF 2025 IN WP/6310/2019 KAMAL BRIJMOHAN MANIYAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .… Mr. A. B. Kale a/w S. A. Kale, Advocates for the Applicants Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 Mr. R. V. Gunale h/f Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for Respondent No.5 .… CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE : 22.09.2025 PER COURT :-
1. The applicants / original petitioners have been constrained to file this application as consequential steps in pursuance of order dated 26.06.2025, have not been taken. By the said order, this Court has taken on record an order passed by the Collector, Jalgaon, canceling the proposal for acquisition of the subject land.
2. We find that consequential directions would have to be specifically issued, so that the logical consequence of taking the said documents on record would follow. 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:26092-DB
(( 2 )) 18-CA-9903-2025
3. Accordingly, the respondent Corporation is directed to take steps for de-reserving the subject land within eight weeks from today and thereafter, the respondent - State shall issue necessary notification within four weeks thereafter, in terms of the provisions of Section 127(2) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act.
4. The civil application is disposed of with the above directions.
[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ MANISH PITALE, J. ] SMS 2 of 2