Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25749 (CHH)

Smt. Sharda Bai Kaushik v. Lukesh Kaushik

CRR/1000/2016 · 2025-06-30

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:29588 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1000 of 2016 1 - Smt. Sharda Bai Kaushik W/o Lukesh Kaushik Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Lasatola, Police Station Kawardha, Tahsil Kawardha, Present Address Maa Karma Ward No. 2, Kawardha, Police Station And Tahsil Kawardha, Civil And Revenue District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ritesh Kaushik S/o Lukesh Kaushik Aged About 1 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Namely Smt. Sharda Bai Kaushik, W/o Lukesh Kaushik, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Lasatola, Police Station Kawardha, Tahsil Kawardha, Present Address Maa Karma Ward No. 2, Kawardha, Police Station And Tahsil Kawardha, Civil And Revenue District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant(s) versus Lukesh Kaushik S/o Baldau Kaushik Aged About 24 Years Occupation- Agriculture, R/o Village- Lasatola, Police Station And Tahsil Kawardha, Civil And Revenue District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent(s) : None. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 01.07.2025 1. This criminal revision has been filed by the applicant seeking following relief: AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN 2 “It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this revision petition and the impugned order dated 05.08.2016 passed by the learned Family Court, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (C.G.) may kindly be modified, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has no instructions, as his client is not responding. It appears that the applicant has lost interest in pursuing the matter, due to efflux of time. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant, the criminal revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Interim relief if any stand vacated. 4. Registrar (Judicial) is directed to transmit the original record as well as the certified copy of this order to the concerned Family Court within a week from today for necessary information and follow up action. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Akhil