Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25746 (KAR)

DR SHARADINI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/13712/2022 · 2025-02-04

S G Pandit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5031 WP No. 13712 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO. 13712 OF 2022 (S-RES) BETWEEN: DR. SHARADINI W/O DR. NAVEEN KUMAR P AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS WORKING AS ASSISTANT PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF OBG BANGALORE MEDICAL COLLEGE K R ROAD, FORT BANGALORE-560002. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVASAN K. R., ADV.) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT (MEDICAL EDUCATION) M S BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001. 2. DEAN-CUM-DIRECTOR BANGALORE MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE K R ROAD, FORT BENGALURU-560002. Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5031 WP No. 13712 of 2022 3. DR. ASHOK KUMAR H S ASSISTANT PROFESSOR. 4. DR. RASHMI KUMAR K ASSISTANT PROFESSOR 5. DR. MANUJA ASSISTANT PROFESSOR R3 TO 5 ARE WORKING AS ASSISTANT PROFESSORS DEPARTMENT OF OBG BANGALORE MEDICAL COLLEGE K R ROAD, FORT BANGALORE-560002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.J. ESHWARAPPA, AGA FOR R1 SRI P.S. MALIPATIL, ADV. FOR R2 SRI SAGAR B.B., ADV. FOR R4 R3 & R5 ARE SERVED) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R- 2 HEREIN TO DECLARE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF PROBATION PERIOD OF THE PETITIONER ON 18.01.2019 ITSELF TREATING THE DATE OF ENTRY INTO SERVICE AS 19.01.2017 AS SENIOR RESIDENT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ’B’ GROUP , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5031 WP No. 13712 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel Sri.K.R.Srinivasan for petitioner and Sri.P.S.Malipatil for respondent No.2, learned counsel Sri.Sagar B.B. for respondent No.4 as well as Sri.B.J.Eshwarappa, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1. Perused the writ petition papers. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working as Assistant Professor in the second respondent-Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute (for short “Institute”). It is the grievance of the petitioner that the petitioner is promoted as Assistant Professor by order dated 15.09.2020 (Annexure-E) and she would be entitled for retrospective promotion from 08.11.2019, the date on which respondent Nos.3 to 5 who are juniors to petitioner are promoted. Learned counsel would submit that under Annexure-L dated 08.11.2019, respondent Nos.3 to 5 are promoted as Assistant Professors. Thus, learned counsel would pray for - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:5031 WP No. 13712 of 2022 consideration of her representation at Annexure-N dated 09.05.2022 and she would confine her prayer to consideration of her request for retrospective promotion from the date of promotion of respondent Nos.3 to 5 to the cadre of Assistant Professor. 3. Learned counsel Sri.P.S.Malipatil on behalf of respondent No.2 would submit that the petitioner was promoted as Assistant Professor on 15.09.2020 and her request for retrospective promotion under Annexure-N representation dated 09.05.2022 would be considered in accordance with law and order would be passed within a reasonable time. 4. The petitioner claims that she is senior to respondent Nos.3 to 5 and she is entitled for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Professor from the date on which, respondent Nos.3 to 5 are promoted to the said cadre under O.M. dated 08.11.2019. Learned counsel would submit that she was subsequently promoted as Assistant Professor under O.M. dated 15.09.2020 but, she claims promotion from - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:5031 WP No. 13712 of 2022 08.11.2019 to the cadre of Assistant Professor. In that regard the petitioner has submitted a representation at Annexure-N dated 09.05.2022. The second respondent- Institute has an obligation in law duty to consider the same and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law. 5. In the light of the above, the following order: Respondent No.2 is directed to consider Annexure-N representation dated 09.05.2022 and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from today. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34