APHC010363462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 18509/2025 Between: 1. M MUNIRATHNAM, , S/O. M.JAYARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT CHIKKANAPALLI VILLAGE, BELUPALLI POST, BAIREDDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. M.RAMADEVI,, W/O. M.SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT CHIKKANAPALLI VILLAGE, BELUPALLI POST, BAIREDDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. M. VARAMMA,, W/O. M.VENKATRAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT CHIKKANAPALLI VILLAGE, BELUPALLI POST, BAIREDDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. . ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAMANERU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BAIREDDYPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BAIREDDYPALLI, CHITTOOR SRS,J W.P.No.18509 of 2025 DISTRICT. 6. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, SETTYPALLE VILLAGE, BAIREDDYPALLE MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction, writ, more particularly Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering with the possession of the petitioners petition schedule land in Sy.No.431/5 to an extent of Ac.0-77 cents in Sy.No.384/1 BI/2 to extent of Ac.1-00, Sy.No.384/1B1/1 to an extent of Ac.0-20 cents of Settypalli Village, Baireddypalli Mandal, Chittoor District as illegal, improper, unjust and contrary to law and to consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners petition schedule land in Sy.No.431/5 to an extent of,Ac.0-77 cents in Sy.No.384/1B1/2 to an extent of Ac.1-00, Sy. No.384/IB 1/1 to an extent of Ac.0-20 cents of Settypalli Village, Baireddypalli Mandal, Chittoor District pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners’ petition schedule land in Sy.No.431/5 to an extent of Ac.0-77 cents in Sy.No.384/1 BI/2 to an extent of Ac.1-00, Sy.No.384/1B1/1 to an extent of Ac.0-20 cents of Settypalli Village, Baireddypalli Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE SRS,J W.P.No.18509 of 2025 The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The grievance of the petitioners is that respondents 4 & 6 are interfering with their possession and enjoyment of land of an extent of Ac.0.77 cents in Sy.No.431/5; Ac.1.00 cents in Sy.No.384/1B1/2 and Ac.0.20 cents in Sy.No.384/1B1/1 of Settypalli Village, Baireddypalli Mandal, Chittoor District without following due process as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard Smt. Y. Mahalakshmi, learned counsel representing Sri K. Raghu Veer, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri G. Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appeared for respondents 1 to 4 & 6 and Sri Ajay, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appeared for respondent No.5. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the then Tahsildar issued DKT pattas to the petitioners vide DKT No.158/4/1422, dated 10.10.2012 and DKT.No.160/4/1422 dated 10.10.2012 in respect of Ac.0.77 cents in Sy.No.431-5 and Ac.1.95 cents in Sy.No.384/85 respectively. Respondent No.4 updated the Record of Rights. The petitioners 2 & 3 are sisters, and in the partition, the 2nd petitioner got Ac.1.00 cents. Be that as it may, respondents 4 & 6, without issuing any notice, are trying to dispossess the petitioners. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appeared for respondents 4 & 6 are not interfering with the petitioners’ possession of the property. The same is recorded. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of both the learned counsel, directing the respondents 4 & 6 not to interfere with an extent of Ac.0.77 cents in Sy.No.431/5; Ac.1.00 cents SRS,J W.P.No.18509 of 2025 in Sy.No.384/1B1/2 and Ac.0.20 cents in Sy.No.384/1B1/1 of Settypalli Village, Baireddypalli Mandal, Chittoor District without following due process. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 22.07.2025 TVN SRS,J W.P.No.18509 of 2025 192 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.18509 OF 2025 Date : 22.07.2025 TVN