SATISH KUMAR PAREEK S/O LATE SHRI RADHA MOHAN LAL PAREEK v. REKHA SRIVASTAVA D/O SHRI RAMESH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA
CW/12711/2023 · 2025-05-21
Avneesh Jhingan, Mukesh Rajpurohit V J
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25741 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25741 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21394-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12711/2023 Satish Kumar Pareek S/o Late Shri Radha Mohan Lal Pareek, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of 36, Shanti Colony, Opp. Airport Terminal-1, Sanaganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Earlier Working As Section Supervisor, Regional Office, Epfo, Nidhi Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rekha Srivastava D/o Shri Ramesh Chandra Srivastava, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of E-402, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur-39, Earlier Working As Accounts Officer In The Office Of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Rajasthan Region, Jaipur Office (Raj.)
2. Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Labour, Government Of India, Central Secretariat, New Delhi- 110001
3. The Employees Provident Fund Organization, Through Its Central Provident Fund Commissioner, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan 14 Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066.
4. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, (Grade-I), Regional Office, Nidhi Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur-302005 (Rajasthan).
5. Shri Surendra Nuwal, Section Supervisor Regional Office, Epfo, Nidhi Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur-302005 (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Amit Mathur, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashwani Chobisa for Resp. No.1 Mr.Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sanju Saini, Adv. for Resp. Nos.2 to 4 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order 21/05/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:21394-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-12711/2023]
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent development, is not pressing this petition at this stage with liberty to avail remedies in case needs so arises. The writ petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J GAURAV /62