[2025:RJ-JP:35007] xzvHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9510/2025 Govind Singh S/o Guman Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bhunathiya, Police Station Shamgarh, District Mandsaur (Haryana) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhalawad). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta Mr. P.L. Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 01/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 47/2024 registered at Police Station Sunel, District Jhalawad for the offences under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is alleged in the FIR that recovery of alleged contraband article containing commercial quantity of poppy straw was effected from an abandoned vehicle. After investigation, it was concluded that the said vehicle belong to co-accused Satish. The present petitioner has been implicated solely on the information of co- accused- Satish and on the basis of his fast-tag which was found [2025:RJ-JP:35007] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9510/2025] in the vehicle. There is no substantive evidence available on record implicating the accused petitioner in the alleged offence. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 15.07.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and has submitted the factual report, the same is taken on record. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact commercial quantity of poppy straw was recovered from the vehicle, which after investigation found to be of co-accused Satish. Apart, from the information of the other co-accused, there is no substantial evidence available on the record indicating the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Govind Singh S/o Guman Singh, in connection with FIR No. 47/2024 registered at Police Station Sunel, District Jhalawad shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:35007] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9510/2025] 7. The accused is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused petitioner to the trial court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /105