HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5968/2016 Shivdan Singh Meena S/o Late Shri Gangaram Meena, Village And Post Harsana, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Distt. Alwar Raj. Senior Citizen ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Commissioner, Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur 3. The Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bharatpur 5. The Block Development Officer, P.S. Bayana, Bharatpur 6. The Block Development Officer, P.S. Laxmangarh, Alwar 7. The Director, Pension Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/01/2025 1. By way of filing this petition, a prayer has been made by the petitioner for issuing directions to the respondents to send his service record to Pachayat Samiti, Bayana from the office of Panchayat Samiti, Laxmangarth, Alwar and thereafter, the due service benefits be accorded to him. (2 of 3) [CW-5968/2016] 2. The contents of the petition indicate that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Panchayat Prashar Officer and thereafter, he was promoted to the post of Grma Sevak and he remained in service till 1992. It has also been indicated in the writ petition that the petitioner stood retired on 31.10.1992 after attaining the age of superannuation, but at the relevant time, his 189 days of privilege leave were due, but no payment for the aforesaid unutilized leaves was made to him by the authorities for the reasons best known to them, even though several correspondences were made by the petitioner with the Department, but no heed was paid, hence, under these circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition. 3. The respondents have submitted a reply to the writ petition, wherein it has been stated that at the time of retirement of the petitioner all retiral dues were paid to him, including the amount for unutilized 189 days privilege leaves. It has also been stated in the reply that the record of Pachayat Samiti, Bayana was destroyed and weeded out in the year 2010, so at this stage, the service record cannot be summoned. No document has been placed on the record in support of the claim that the payment of 189 days of un- utilized leaves has been paid to the petitioner. 4. Considering the nature of controversy involved in this petition, the instant petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the petitioner to submit appropriate application in the Office of the respondents for grant of the due service (3 of 3) [CW-5968/2016] benefits which were not extended to him at the time of his retirements. 5. In case, any amount is due against the petitioner, it is expected from the respondents to make the payment of the same and if payment of the retiral dues has already been made in favour of the petitioner, then appropriate orders with details be passed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. 6. Since, the petitioner has remained unrepresented before this Court and he is not aware about passing of this order, Office is directed to send a copy of this order at the residential address of the petitioner mentioned in the memo of petition for his information and intimation. 7. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/102