Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25729 (AP)

Komati Naga Satyaveni, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/24133/2020 · 2025-08-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010362772020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24133/2020 Between: 1. KOMATI NAGA SATYAVENI,, W/O. SOMAIAH, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 28 YEARS, R/O. H.NO3-188, NARKEDMALLI VILLAGE, ATREYAPURAM VANDAL, EAST GODAVRI DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VALAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ATREYAPURAM POLICE STATION, ATREYAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not conducting investigation in proper lines and diluting the case in Cr.No.162/2020 on the file of 3rd Respondent as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and in violation of the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code and also offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd 2 respondent to monitor the investigation in Cr.No.162/2020 on the file of 3rd respondent police station and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to conduct proper investigation In Cr.No.162/2020 on the file of 3rd respondent police station and also to protect the petitioner and her children from the hands of the above named persons pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not conducting investigation in proper lines and diluting the case in Cr.No.162/2020 on the file of 3rd Respondent as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and in violation of the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code and also offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to monitor the investigation in Cr.No.162/2020 on the file of 3rd respondent police station and pass.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that the investigation is completed and the charge sheet has been filed in Cr.No.162 of 2020. 3. Sri M.Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, this writ petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the submission of learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:19.08.2025 MH 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 25 W.P.No.24133 of 2020 Dt.19.08.2025 MH