Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25727 (RAJ)

ATMARAM SHARMA S/O SHRIRAM SHARMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/11436/2025 · 2025-08-25

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33670] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11436/2025 Atmaram Sharma S/o Shriram Sharma, Aged About 75 Years, R/o Ward No. 10, Purani Basti, Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supplies, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Commissioner (Civil Supplies And Food), Department Of Food, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The District Collector (Supply), Jhunjhunu. 4. The District Supply Officer, District Jhunjhunu. 5. Enforcement Officer, Block Supply Office, Block Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prashant Sharma for Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav for Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy. G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 25/08/2025 1. The present petition pertain to various districts for allotment and other issues pertaining to fair price shops. The competent authority is stated to be concerned District Collector or any officer authorised by him. 2. Learned counsel Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav on behalf of Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy.GC has taken a preliminary objection that the matter primarily pertain to policy and there are different factual disputes which can be addressed before the competent authority. [2025:RJ-JP:33670] (2 of 2) [CW-11436/2025] However, learned counsel is agreeable to the fact that the contentions or grievances of the petitioner herein can be heard within a period of 15 days by the competent authority i.e. District Collector. It is submitted that after giving due audience and considering the representation of the petitioner, appropriate speaking order will be passed by the competent authority. 3. In light of the submissions made by learned counsel, this Court deems it proper to dispose of the present petition with a direction that the petitioner or aggrieved party mark his appearance before the concerned District Collector on 17.09.2025 at 11:00 am and after giving due audience, speaking order will be passed by the competent authority. 4. This Court makes it clear that till passing of orders, the allotment of the shop qua the disputed sites will be kept in abeyance; passing of this order will not cause any prejudice to either of the sides. 5. Accordingly, present petition stand disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. 6. Appropriate remedy will be available to the petitioner, if the petitioner aggrieved by the order passed by the District Collector. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/59