APHC010362722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) i TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY fp TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18542 OF 2025 ■I O Between: Mandapati Pardha Saradhi, S/o M. Rama Chandra Rao, Aged about 51 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. D. No. 1-9, Buttaigudem, Eluru District ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Eluru District at Eluru. 3. The Station House Officer, Buttaigude Police Station, Eluru District 4. Mandapati Mani Kumar, S/o Satyanarayana Buttaigume, Eluru Distirct 5. Mandapati Pothanna, /o Satyanrayana, R/o Akkampeta, Buttaigume, Eluru Distirct 6. Mandapati Damodhar, S/o Potanna R/o Akkampeta, Buttaigume, Eluru Distirct 7. Mandapati Murali Mohan, S/o Mukkiah R/o Akkampeta, Buttaigume, Eluru Distirct R/o Akkampeta ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 3 in not receive the petitioner’s complaint dated 15.04.2025 and to investigate the same against the Respondent No. 4 to 7 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of Cr.P.C and consequently respondent police to receive and take appropriate legal action on complaint dated 15.04.2025 against the Respondent No. 4 to 7. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 3 to receive and Register the petitioner’s complaint dated 15.04.2025 and to taken up the investigation forthwith by apprehending the Respondent No. 4 to 7 herein pending disposal of the Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VUYYURU LAKSHMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.4 to 7: None appeared The Court made the following Order: rd direct the 3 the APHC010362722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18542/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Mandapati Pardha Saradhi AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.VUYYURU LAKSHMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following; THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18542/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for; “...to issue a Writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.3 in not receive the petitioner’s complaint dated 15.04.2025 and to investigate the same against the Respondent No.4 to 7 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of Cr.P.C. and consequently direct the 3'^ respondent police to receive and take appropriate legal action on the complaint dated 15.04.2025 against the Respondent No.4 to 7 and others and to pass...” Heard Sri Vuyyuru Lakshmana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Police have not received any complaint/representation from the petitioner to register a case against the respondent Nos.4 to 7, further after filing of the present petition and on receipt of the affidavit of the present petition, the Police have enquired into it and found that it is purely a civil dispute and they have not registered any crime against the respondent Nos.2 to 7 and requested to dispose of the matter. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the the petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter before appropriate forum. 2. 3. 4. same 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition i petitioner is at liberty to pursue the matter before the order as to costs. As a sequel thereto IS disposed of. However, the appropriate forum. No miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC N OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Amaravathi, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Eluru District at Eluru. 3. The Station House Officer, Buttaigude Police Station, Eluru District 4. One CC to Sri. Vuyyuru Lakshmana Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for HOME ,High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies Home Dept., Secretariat Buildings, vna HIGH COURT DATED:22/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 18542 OF 2025 ^ 0 7 AUG 2025 )^] * SectloQ,-^^ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS