APHC010364152002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. KOLUSU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SRI LAKSHMAIAH KODURU (V) G.KONDURU (M) KRISHNA DISTRICT 1. PRL SECY BC WELFARE DEPT HYD 3 ORS, B.C.WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYD 2. COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DISTRICT 3. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA 4. NANDAMURU NAGALAKSHMI, KODURU BRANCH POST OFFICE, KRISHNA DIST. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the memo no.3248/C1/2000 the first respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the facts and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondent no.3 to reappoint the petitioner herein as Branch Post Master of Kodur Branch post master of Kodur Branch post office of G.Kondur (M), Krishn benefits. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 23673/2002 KOLUSU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SRI LAKSHMAIAH KODURU (V) G.KONDURU (M) KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND PRL SECY BC WELFARE DEPT HYD 3 ORS, B.C.WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYD COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA NANDAMURU NAGALAKSHMI, KODURU BRANCH POST OFFICE, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the memo no.3248/C1/2000-9, dt.18 highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the facts and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondent no.3 to reappoint the petitioner herein as Branch Post Master of Kodur Branch post master of Kodur Branch post office of G.Kondur (M), Krishna District with all consequential IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI KOLUSU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SRI LAKSHMAIAH KODURU (V) ...PETITIONER PRL SECY BC WELFARE DEPT HYD 3 ORS, B.C.WELFARE MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA NANDAMURU NAGALAKSHMI, KODURU BRANCH POST OFFICE, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature 9, dt.18-6-2002 of highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the facts and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondent no.3 to reappoint the petitioner herein as Branch Post Master of Kodur Branch post master of Kodur a District with all consequential 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 29713 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned Memo No.3248/C1/2000-9, dated 18-6-2002 of the 1st respondent. IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 8239 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing in wp IA NO: 2 OF 2004(WPMP 24415 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing of the wp IA NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP 6909 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date for hearing of the writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 109801 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BADANA BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M UMA DEVI (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2. 3. M UMADEVI 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 01.08.2025 and 07.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 29.08.2025 MP 4 129 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:23673 of 2002 Date: 29.08.2025 MP