[2025:RJ-JP:34257] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9285/2025 1. Gaurav S/o Moti Lal, R/o Ward No. 31, Raipur Near Masjid, Kota P.s. Udhyog Nagar, District Kota (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi Raj.). 2. Deepak S/o Brajmohan, R/o Village Jharbalapura, P.s. Sadar Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9553/2025 Golu Gurjar @ Ramlaxman S/o Ramdut, R/o Daglawada, Thana Talera, Distt. Bundi (Raj.) (At Presently Confined In District Jail Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Choudhary Dr. Mahesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/08/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.96/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi (Raj.) for the offences punishable [2025:RJ-JP:34257] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9285/2025] under Sections 143(2), 143(3), 127(2) & 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that petitioners are neither named in the FIR nor victims have named them in their statement. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against petitioner- Gaurav and petitioner- Deepak whereas one other case has been registered against petitioner- Golu Gurjar @ Ramlaxman. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submit that petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the material available before me in the form of case diary, as also considering the fact that as per statement of victims, main allegation is against co-accused namely- Banwari Lal Shekhar and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is [2025:RJ-JP:34257] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9285/2025] directed that accused-petitioners – 1) Gaurav S/o Moti Lal, 2) Deepak S/o Brajmohan and 3) Golu Gurjar @ Ramlaxman S/o Ramdut shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /118 & 120