DR. MADAN MOHAN SHARMA S/O LAXMIKANT SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/11446/2025 · 2025-07-30
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25716 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25716 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:28921] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11446/2025
1. Dr. Madan Mohan Sharma S/o Laxmikant Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Govind Mohalla, Kaman, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, At Present Working On The Post Of Smo-I At Chc, Kaman, Bharatpur.
2. Dr. Pushpesh Kumar Mishra S/o Ramesh Chandra Mishra, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 73D, Lajpat Nagar, Scheme-2, Alwar, At Present Working On The Post Of Smo-I At Govt. Ayurved Aushdhalya, Kaman, Bharatpur.
3. Dr. Jagdish Prasad Sharma S/o Radhe Shyam Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o D-95, Hasan Khan Mewat Nagar, Alwar, Rajasthan, At Present Working On The Post Of Smo-Ii At Govt. Ayurved Aushdhalya, Shahpur, Alwar.
4. Dr. Meena Bhardwaj W/o Vinay Bhardwaj, Aged About 60 Years, R/o B-3-34, Apna Ghar Shalimar, Telco Circle, Alwar, At Present Working On The Post Of Smo-I At At Govt. Ayurved Aushdhalya, Saithli, Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda (Ayush), Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Deputy Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya Chikitsa (Ayush), Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. The Director, Nideshalay Ayurved Vibhag, Rajasthan, Ajmer Having Its Office At Ashok Marg, Savitri Chauraha, Ajmer, Rajasthan- 305001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Neetu Bhansali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Ms. Kavita Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 30/07/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:28921] (2 of 2) [CW-11446/2025] Issue notice. Notices are accepted by Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma-learned Additional Advocate General on behalf of the respondents. This writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties:-
“(i) The petitioners shall be permitted to continue in service till they attain the age of 62 years, i.e., the superannuation age. Pending application(s), if nay, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/52