SITARAM MEENA S/O SHRI RAMPHOOL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/270/2025 · 2025-07-23
Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25711 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25711 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:27497-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 270/2025 Sitaram Meena S/o Shri Ramphool Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bageena, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.).
3. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Raj.).
4. The Superintendent Of Police, Sawai Madhopur.
5. The Sho, Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur.
6. The Sho, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk.
7. The Sho, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur.
8. Mansingh S/o Unknown, R/o Vpo Devli, Police Station Ali- garh, District Tonk.
9. Ramjilal S/o Unknown, R/o Village Nahari, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk.
10. Lokesh S/o Ramjilal Meena, R/o Village Nahari, Police Sta- tion Aligarh, District Tonk.
11. Golu S/o Mansingh, R/o Vpo Devli, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk.
12. Dinesh Meena S/o Ballo, R/o Police Station Indragarh, District Bundi.
13. Haribhajan Meena S/o Girraj, R/o Vpo Nahari, Police Sta- tion Aligarh, Tehsil Uniyara, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Omprakash Meena Mr. Pavan Kumar Bairwa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
[2025:RJ-JP:27497-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-270/2025]
Order 23/07/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time is not pressing this petition with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law.
2. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
3. There is no doubt in the eventuality of petitioner availing the remedies in accordance with law, the Forum concerned shall con- sider the same expeditiously.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/57