[2025:RJ-JP:34021] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11709/2025 1. Satish Sharma S/o Nathu Lal Sharma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Behind Bsnl Office, Shiv Raj Nagar, Hindoli, District Bundi, Rajasthan. 2. Sultan Singh Meena S/o Kanhaiya Lal Meena, Aged About 43 Years, R/o VPO Sarsiya, Block Jahazpur, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. 3. Lakshmi Lal Dangi S/o Mangi Lal Dangi, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Fatehpura, Tehsil Mavli, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Vakeel Ahmad S/o Yakat Ali, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kaman Gate, Behind Laxman Mandir, Deeg, Rajasthan. 5. Prahlad Rai Sharma S/o Shanti Lal Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Rai Mohalla, Vpo Ghoras, Tehsil Mandal, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 27/08/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners for seeking directions against the respondents to give them appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-III, Level-II Science Math subject by operating the waiting list. [2025:RJ-JP:34021] (2 of 2) [CW-11709/2025] 2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that the respondents issued one advertisement dated 11.09.2017 in order to invite applications from all eligible persons for recruitment on the post of Teacher Grade-III, Level-II. The petitioners submitted application pursuant to advertisement and participated in the process, however, they could not be selected in the main list and their names find place in the waiting list. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners while relying upon the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4628/2019 (Shanker Lal Jat Vs. The Principal Secretary decided on 29.01.2021), has prayed for operating the waiting list and to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Firstly, as per the case of the petitioners, their name were in the waiting list prepared in the year 2018, it is settled proposition of law that the waiting list candidate has got no vested right to seek appointment. Secondly, waiting list cannot be sought to be operated after lapse of period of seven years. 6. Order dated 29.01.2021 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Shanker Lal Jat (supra), was in respect of a writ petition which was filed in the year 2019. Thereafter, more than six years have lapsed since completion of the process. 7. In view of above, there is no substance in the writ petition filed by the petitioners and the same is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /37